And so most stories begin (or it was a cold, dark night ... but I am trying to look ahead here), Jacques has come out of the gates with a good start. The race however is a 4 year stretch. Will he change the face of Alexandria politics? Will it be better or worse?
Perhaps this blog might be used by the citizens of Alexandria to impart our wants and desires to our new adminstration. If you want investigations, ask for them here. If you want something brought to Alexandria ask here.
Why doesn't everyone on this blog say or do something positive on this thread? We can get back to the slaughterhouse next thread.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1,247 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 1247 Newer› Newest»Oh and I imagine this latest round of attacks upon me is that I am in the midst of several public records requests to the City of Pineville, where I am investigating information which was given to me, as most is, by people who live in Pineville. If the information proves cirrect, I will report it to the appropirate authority. If it does not prove true, I will do nothing further on those particular matters.
You see, government does not like people looking into what they do. Why not simply let the facts come out and see what is found by an official agency charged with oversight? I guess that many of you do not really like open and honest government.
Mr. Aymond, I think you overlook the obvious. There appears to be very little interest on this blog for those issues over which you obscess. The net result is a boat load of resentment for you, be it what you are, what you were, what you want. If you truly cared about anyone but yourself, you would spare us your obscession. Continue to wage war against those who concern you but don't victimize us. Would you do us that favor. You have your own blog to which people might go if their world revolves around Water Dist. #3 or Rich Dupree. If we are interested, we will come there.
Will you do this for us?
wesawthat... said...
cover up at city hall
This matter is on the agenda for disussion during Council committee meetings on 11/21/06. How in the hell does the TT thinks there is a coverup. Releasing the report without appropriate explanation would be dangerous. GEEZ!!!!!!!!!
Целуйте мои пески(выдержку). Ричард Дж. Пустошь
吻我的粗磨粉。理查德
Continue to wage war against those who concern you but don't victimize us. Would you do us that favor.
Apparently you did not comprehend what I said. I come here to post and read about other matters. However, I do respond, when I feel so inclined, to any matters, including attacks on me and and matters of the other side of the River. Why do you not attack or tell to go elsewhere, those that bring up or copy what I say on my site? Some of you people seem to posess little logic. Sometimes you uphold freedom of thought and speech, and then many of you presume to tell me what I can post here or not to post at all. Sometimes you deplore vulgarity, personal attacks and induendo, yet seem to feel fine with it if durected at me. Such remarks are illogical and clearly inconsistent.
If you don't like what I post, argue facts with me, or skip my posts. The only one who can stop me from posting here is this Blog's owner. I do not base my opinions, beliefs or what I say on whether people will like me or not for saying it. I can assure you that I don't agree with or like everything posted on here, but I do not attack the right to post, as long as its factual or a knowledgeable opinion. So continue to show your desires for ignorance, censorship, and inconsistency.
The fact that the City Council will discuss the reports on Coughlin-Saunders Performing Arts Center, is no lawful reason not to release them in a public records request. If any explaination is needed to interpret those documents, then the requester can ask for it. I feel relatively sure that if the Council meber can comprehend it, many others can as well. Citizens have an absolute right to public records.
That being said however, one exception to that rule is if the City is perhaps planning litigation as a result of those reports. What stage of any such litigation claims are at, I don't think we yet know, if at all. Bottom line, if not excluded by one of the reasons set forth in the Public Records law, people have a lawful right to see that report. If you favor government being able to hide information from the people, see your Legislator about changing the existing law.
"see your Legislator about changing the existing law."
Good advice, but what if my Legislator doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground?????
Let me give you a hint..I live in district 27
The only problem I have with the Town Talk seeking the report before it is discussed in Council, which by the way is a public forum is this - why should the newspaper receive information to review and then have the ability to question councilmen who will only have had Tuesday's meeting to formally discuss the report? Yes, they may have had it prior to the meeting, but the formal discussion of this report takes place in that committee meeting. If there are questions to be asked they should be asked first by the council there on behalf of us - the taxpayers of Alexandria who are footing the bill and then followed up by the newspaper. The Town Talk should not be out to "scoop" the COuncil. Citizens who have questions can appear at the committee meeting to hear the discussion in person and ask questions. That's why committee meetings and council meetings are open. HELLO!!!!
The Town Talk to my knowledge has not asked for any other consultant's report in advance. Why this one?
For those who think Joanne got the WIB straightened out think again. Yes, she stuck to her guns, and yes the Jury had to back down at the time, but believe me, when the WIA has it in its mind it is not going to do something for an employer, it does everything possible to make sure that's what happens - nothing. So in a sense, despite mitigation, despite the entire board resigning, despite all of the turmoil caused, nothing in essence has changed. The Jury continues to put in place political appointees whether they are qualified for the position or not.
Greg, I believe your comments might be more welcome if every single time you posted you didn't give a complete blow by blow of the entire WWIII ordeal, Roy Hebron and his ethics challenges, your problem with Rich Dupree and the like. Simply defend yourself without all the additional verbage or why not refer the offending blogger to one of the numerous previous posts where you have explained yourself millions of times by now. I think we all get it. You have sued Pineville successfully. Hebron has ethically issues. You do not.
Now, can we move on?
I read in The Town Talk that Herbert Dixon is running for Curtis' house seat.
"I read in The Town Talk that Herbert Dixon is running for Curtis' house seat."
Japs bomb pearl harbor.....
Billy Gunn reported today that the City has retained Baton Rouge lawyers, for possible litigation over the leaks at the Coughlin-Saunders Performing Arts Center.
Why is it that we have lawyers that currently work for the City, and scores of lawyers right here in Alexandria, that litigate defect in construction cases of all sizes, but the City went to Baton Rouge?
That's right, Greg. Stay by your phone. Kelvin Sanders should be calling you momentarily. He feels that we need someone of your talent, reputation, skill, and professional stature to take on the Coughlin-Saunders problem.
I see where recently discovered political genius, John Flynn, the architect of the Roy landslide, will be heading up Herbert Dixon's legislature run. Move over Rove and Carville - here comes Genuine John.
I vowed I would not participate in a race baiters anonoymous public postings designed to foster racial unrest and continued division of the two communities but I would like to offer the following:
I agreed to serve on the Board in an honest effort to contribute in some small way to Society, Alexandria, Rapides Parish and the State of Louisiana for the privelege of being born in a free nation and uphold my responsibility to help those less fortunate.
It was/is my opinion that at the time I ws appointed to the WIB the Board had degraded to a political power play between individuals and the purpose of the Board seemed forgotten. Parish employees (white and black) were chosing sides as to which "leader" they would follow. There seemed to be great consternation between Von Jennings, who in my opinion sided with Mrs. White along with the retired Air Force gentleman that was a Supervisor and resigned under charges of sexual harrassment(this happened long after the Von Jennings resignation)and who was hired by the Trade School, and the Parish employees charged with the task of running WIB administratively.
Von Jennings resigned, before my short time on the Board, then I think it Mr. Reed's Preacher's wife was hired, supposedly by Mrs. White at the urging of Joe Fuller, as Von Jennings replacement. Von Jennings was then employed by the Trade School.
When the new Board was formed
I was (and still am) of the opinion that an entire new approach needed to be taken. There were situations I viewed as "special" such as an approved training program for a local pawn shop to train "pawn brokers' and receive training funds.
Coincedentally, at the time the pawn shop owner and a parish employee with the Job Training Center lunched together almost on a daily basis at the Red Kettle with the Pawn Shop owner paying the tab.
The State Labor Department was seriously considering taking away the program from Rapides Parish and placing it under the supervision of Vernon Parish. Wouldn't that have been an embarrassment to the Parish?
I felt all those associated with political power plays and the fighting should remove themselves from the Board and allow the new board to attempt to fullfill the assigned mission. In explaining my vews, and yes it my utterance was on tape and the tape was professionally cleaned up and trasncribe, I used the word Nigger.
Upon my transgression being brought to my atention as well as the attention of the world through the rag called the Town Talk, I called the Lady I insulted. My conversation with her consisted of my apology, I explained to her, and felt she understood being the wife of a Preacher, that as a Chistian I must make amends with the party I offended, not with the Town Talk or others. I am to this day not convinced she accepted my apology but such is life.
I resigned from the Board feeling my simple ways of not being a perfect human being nor being aware of political fighting, race baiting and political correctnes were not suited for trying to give back to a society that has been generous to me. I embarassed myself, my family and the Police Jury man that appointed me.
I have, however, been forgiven of my transgression by the One that counts so little else matters.
Now you have the facts from a "coon ass not a cour rouge, a non-slave owner descendent and from a person who cares little about what some anonymous, hid behind the monitor, race baiting asshole thinks. In closing, my phone number is still in the book. This is now a closed chapter in my life.
reputation, skill, and professional stature to take on the Coughlin-Saunders problem.
Wow what an ignorant smart-ass remark. Exactly what statistics do you base that dumbass remark on? Do you know which contruction companies I have represented? How many construction cases have I won and how many have I lost? Also, it appears you are also ignorant as to who hires lawyers for the City. Try to get a brain before your next post.
The above posting should have been signed by Richard J. Heath, not anonymous. Excuse my lack of technical knowledge and familiarity relative to utilizing one of these sites. I tend to not involve myself with the goings on of those that are so immature that they will not acknowledge their words.
After looking this site over my thoughts are well evidenced by the anonymous baiter of Mr. Aymonds. I would not know M. Aymonds if I met him at high noon on a deserted street but it seems to me he has, in a mature manner, offerred anonymous an opportunity to openly and maturly confront him. In fact I think Mr. Aymond has called anonymous out. This site seems well stocked with run off at the mouth people with no backbone.
In my time if I hated Mr. Aymond as bad as anonymous does we would have met under the stadium at Bolton not posting anonymous rantings on this site. Anonymous you so bad go get a piece of him.
The mayor hires the city attorney and the city attorney hires all the other attornies with the consent of the council. It in the charter. Once again you show your lack of legal knowledge. Go greg.
the consent of the council
Right, so that means Kelvin cannot hire any. The Council hires. Try again.
Like many of you I have watched the ongoing feud between lawyer Aymond and his detractors. Like many of you I have not voiced my opinion in this war because I believed it didn't concern me. However, lawyer Aymond's latest poste reveal a lot about the mans personality and character.
Read this carefully:
"That statement shows that you, like many others, form an opinion without knowledge of the facts."
And this:
"Oh and I imagine this latest round of attacks upon me is that I am in the midst of several public records requests to the City of Pineville, where I am investigating information which was given to me, as most is, by people who live in Pineville."
And this:
"Apparently you did not comprehend what I said."
And this:
"I am also making a public records request to the Water DIstrict and the D.A.'s office for any reports of fraud on me."
Then he attacks everyone on this blog with:
"And what is it with you people on this Blog, do you have double standards?...Do you develop your opinions without any fact or proof?"
He is, in effect, saying that any fact, other than the ones that he uncovers, are unreliable and false.
I get the distinct impression that lawyer Aymond is a megalomaniac of the first order. He constantly tells all of us that we don't know the facts, or we interpret the facts incorrectly, no body is as smart as he is, and he must investigate and report on everyone, He twists reality making his role in even the most minor occurrences, seem larger than they are.
He even had the nerve to question our mayor-elect with this:
"I would have preferred more City workers on the transition team."
True, he goes on to compliment Roy, but the tone is one of a vastly superior intellect patting a child on the head for using the toilet correctly.This man honestly believes that he should patrol city hall and the courthouse dressed in a spandex suit with an “S” painted on his chest.
I have visited his site. It’s like walking into a serial killer’s lair and seeing the twisted trophies of his kills, or looking into the mind of some obsessed stalker bent on getting attention from elected officials in this area.
Based on HIS OWN WORDS, I think lawyer Aymond is one sick puppy.
I do know Aymond, I am familiar with his legal and personal history. While all that makes me dislike him intensly, I am most impressed with a personality that is so disfunctional that he would continue to bask in this abuse and disaffection rather than have nobody to talk to at all. There appears to be a lot of social and emotional pathology there. That explains some of his hate-based activity. He feels victimized by normal folks. Creepy. An endorsement by this Heath guy says something.
Greg, the president appoints the secretary of state with the advice and consent of the senate. So who appoints the secretary of state? Sorry to embarrass you but you make it soooo easy.
The city attorney appoints all of the other attorneys. Get a 4th grader to explain it to you.
Could it possibly be that the City had to go to Baton Rouge to avoid a conflict of interest between the any attorney in Alexandria and the company who actually performed the work? Come on people let's think about this. We hired local contractors to work on this building. They are represented by local attorneys. In order to prevent a conflict of interest, I would fully support using an out of town firm to make sure my tax dollars are protected in this particular instance.
I don't think the Heath guy endorsed anyone. I think the Heath guy said you anonymous ain't nothing but mouth with no ass or backbone. As the Heath guy said if you hate him that much go get as big a piece of Aymonds as you want.
I think your cowardice keeps you from doing that. If I hated as much as you do (isn't this admission of intense hate be indicative of mental instability) and the object of my hatred gave me an oportunity without fear of legal ramifications to duke it out I would let him set the meeting, sell tickets and keep the proceeds.
You anonymous are nothing but an alligator mouth with a hummingbird ass. Be Aymond right or wrong he has presented you with various options in order for you to obtain satisfaction. You just want to stir the pot. ome on be a man and meet him!!!!!!!!!
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT. AFTER SCHOOL GREGG AND ANON. Gregg offer the mouth a place and time.
"Also, anyone who wants to whip my ass, is also free to do so or try." "Of course if you hate me so much, you are always welcome to grow a back bone and tell me to my face. I am fairly easy to locate."
"Oh yes indeed I really do want you to come looking for me. And your failure to do so shows all exactly what a lying chicken shit coward you are. I am 5'5" and 235 lbs, so I don't think I qualify as a dwarf. I will even sign a waiver of liability, in case you have the balls to take me on."
HUMMINGBIRD ASS ANONYMOUS YOU BEEN CALLED OUT AND IN PUBLIC.
I doubt that you are talking to one anti-aymond detractor but what if the detractor is a woman, elderly, in poor health, blind, or even scared. That really doesn't alter the fact that the city attorney appoints the other attorney or that aymond doesn't know what he's talking about. And you really have to respect this Heeth guy: he hates "niggars" and whips ass for Jesus. I think I've seen in CBN.
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!!!!!!!!HUMINGBIRD ASS ANONYMOUSE AND AYMOND.
I seriously doubt anyone is physically affraid of Aymond but if you whip him what does it prove. Mike Tyson could whip Einstein - who was the superior human. What kind of unfortunate intellect resorts to wanting to have a fist fight with those that best him or her intellectually? Sick puppies.
GAEDA is trying to promote CENLA as a center for fights. Next card ANONYMOUSE AND YMOND.
Hummingbird Ass Anonymouse is afraid of Aymond that is why he does his dirty work on this blog instead of being mature enough to settle his differences with Aymond.
Hummingbird Ass Anonymouse knows ymond can't resist responding so Hummingboard Ass Anonymouse uses his twisted brain to taunt Aymonds.
Hummingbird Ass Anonymouse is the playground child that threw a temper tantrum and ran crying to the teacher hen he didn't get his way.
If hummingbird Ass Anonymouse hates Aymond so bad he should take Aymond up on a face to face meeting.
I didn't really realize mike Tyson hated Einstein
Do you even think Mike Tyson knows who Einstein is?
Does anyone know to which state agency that campaign finance violations such as Mary Jo Mansour and others "loaning" delores $5000 before the runoff without her reporting them as loans should be reported to. It is time that they answer for these violations and that the public be made aware of these cheaters so that this conduct will stop once and for all.
Louisiana Board of Ethics and The Supervisory Committee for Campaign Finance
"An endorsement by this Heath guy says something."
Yeah, it says he hates niggers too.....
I got an idea: let Heath fight Aymond and the winner is King of Deville.
Let's book it at the new Lawson Sports Complex. I promise you every brother from Dallas to Mobile would buy a ticket to see these guys bloody each other's sheets. Don King, where are you?
I're read all the postings since this blog started and I have followed the ranting of Aymond and the angry responses he has gotten. However, despite the dislike I have for the wording, I have observed that much of what Aymond has said is true. It tends to give me reason to think that he has some valid information. The reaction he has gotten would also tend to make me think that he is stepping on some toes with truthful information. I for one would like to hear more from Aymond listed in a factual manner with less editorial comment and learn aboutwhatever real evidence or information he has to back it up. Maybe a historical perspective on what he knows or what his problem is with Dupree , Fields and Hebron is about. Thank you.
Just list your accusations in bullet point and give us the hard evidence IF any. That simple. If you have a point Aymond, it gets lost from all the angry rambling.
If you really have photos or statements or documents. Put it online. If what you say is truthful the actual evidence will support you . Offereing for people to come to you personally is generous but most folks are not going to do that nor will they get excited or supportive of you unless they can see it online . The anonymous nature of this blog is good in one way because those who view can see and review stufff without sticking their necks out. So Greg , if you have proof of what you say then find a way to post it on here. If what you say is true then you will be much more believable and perhaps turn from goat to hero. I am very hopeful that you will try this.
Isn't there some presumption in law that if an opposting party has evidence that he does not introduce that it is "presumed" not to be favorable to the person who possesses the evidence? Don't lose your credibility by saying you have proof and then not showing it to us.
Another respectful suggestion: say what you have to say ONCE. Reposting the same stuff over and over, jewels though it may be, does not make it true or important. That should go for all of us (except those criticising the 2-named blue hairs - do that as often as you like).
So, this is an encourgement or suggestion. Aymond, please take a little time and organize your thoughts and information and post it here once and for all. I think it would be great to have an organized focused summary of your gripes or revelations and the proof that backs it up. That would make it more difficult for those who respond so angrily to discount you and maybe silence your critics. BUT only if you are telling the truth.
Thrilla in Devilla has got to be Spanky or Biff.
Whoever said that Mary Jo gave Delores $5000 without reporting it should also prove it. Did you see the check yourself? Spreading lies like that doesn't do anything to improve your credibility. Some of these Roy supporters should have to put up or shut up.
Cenla GoPac Officers
Wayne Ryan, Chairman
Milton Gordon, Vice Chairman
Chuck Tosten, Secretary
Alice Bryant, At Large
Quint Carriere, At Large
Steve Durr, At Large
Larry Jeanne, At Large
Garland Lawrence, At Large
Matt Seaton, At Large
Bill Thomas, At Large
Randy Wiggins, At Large
All of these accusations flying around from the Roy people smack of political operatives. No one will come out and put their name on them. Look at the things said about Scarlet. She was totally forthright about why she worked in Brewer's campaign. Some of you just go on and on and continue to accuse people of things you can't back up. You should put your name on those posts.
What the hell does that mean? What do those names have to do with anything pertaining to the blog? This is kindergarten stuff.
That really doesn't alter the fact that the city attorney appoints the other attorney or that aymond doesn't know what he's talking about.
What a dumbass. Look at 4-02 of the
City Charter: "(D) No special legal counsel shall be employed by the city except by written contract and approval of the city council."
Apparently some of you lack sufficient reading comprehension to distinguish that the City Attorney hires other lawyers for his office, but lawyers that do not work for the City are "employed" by the City Council. Now who doesn't know what they are talking about?
Believe me , it will be put up to the board of ethics and we will then see who was telling the truth; in the meanwhile, go ask mary jo and watch her start gagging and blubbering about it
But did you see the exchange? Was it a check or cash or what? Since you seem to know so much about it, surely you know that information also. Did you see the check!
We hired local contractors to work on this building. They are represented by local attorneys.
No one attorney represents all local contractors. How would he then have a conflict if it is one he doesn't represent? Also, I doubt every trade which did work on that job can be responsible for leaks.
Statistically I suppose it could be Roy people since 76% of the responsible humans in Alexandria are. I just don't understand why they would be bitter or have an ax to grind. They proved they were right.
Let's see . . . . who might be a little bitter and have sour grapes and sunk bunches of money in to a cruise on the political Titanic??? Hmmmmm . . . . . .
I'm glad we were able to reason with Aymond. It would truly be a shame if he were the sort of unreasonable person who had a pathological need to be disagreeable. But obviously that's not the case. I can sense the olive branch stuck up his rather sizable ass.
I will say this for the last time, and cannot help you to understand it any better. Spanky is the only one, from this Blog, that has had the balls, or interest in the truth, to take me up on my offer to come to my office and look at this evidence.
The size of my website does not permit my uploading the photographs, documents and tapes there. However, any of you that wishes to pay for a site of suffienect size, I will gladly post the information there. I don't know what more I can do, but I am open to suggestions.
I suspect, however, many of you simply prefer to keep mouthing off and have little regard for facts. Obviously, the Ehtics Board had it, as seen in the actions it has taken.
I would also suggest that you check with other lawyers and local judges has to my competency. Like any other lawyer, some will like me, some do not. I doubt if any of them will say I am incompetent.
So the ball is in your court. You are welcome to provide webspace, come to my office and see, even give me an ass whuppin, or continue to show you ignorance by posting about matters you do not know of.
So, OK Aymond. You said it. Folks can go to your web site, telephone you, come to your office, whip your ass, talk to other lawyers, etc.
I doubt that there is any need to repeat any of this by any of us. You put the information and your position out there. Folks can take it or leave it. Thank you.
Don't need to see a check when she was gloating all over town about until she found out it was a campaign finance violation; yes , she said it to others, so now what , ask me if i heard her say it to others. Look , the ethics board has subpoena power and the facts will be revealed. Noone has an axe to grind; it is simply time for the holier than thou cheaters to be exposed. All things considered , does it really shock you that she and delores would stoop to this?
It looks like a have to post one more time and correct an error I made. The Preacher's wife was not Ezra Reed's Preacher's wife it was Scott Pery's Preacher's wife.
I received a call from an astute individual questioning my statement and I did in fact make a mistake.
Scott Perry got Joe Fuller the Police Juryman assigned to the WIB to get Mrs. White to hire the Lady as Von Jennings replacement.
... and because she was Scott Perry's preacher's wife, you were justified in calling her the N-word.
Idiot.
You're missing the point. The mistake was justified because they all look alike. What a guy
The irony is that the J in Richard "J" Heath stands for Javarius.
Is Heath about 62 or 63 years old? I remember one of those from Bolton High. His reference to the Bolton bleachers rang a bell. I haven't seen him in 40 years but I remember him being a pretty nice guy. Doesn't sound like he tolerated the fallout of the civil rights movement too well. Is that you, Richard?
Mr. Aymond,
With all do respect, I can appreciate your passion but frankly I've lost my patience. Please move your horse beating to a different blog, with a forwarding address of course.
Greg - Noone wants to hear anymore from you or your nemesis. You are now boring us to death. Please move.
I disagree. I encourage courage and truth and Mr Aymond seems to have both. The only reason I would want him to stop is if he were talking about me. Maybe thats why at least one person is so adamantly against him. Keep up the mission Mr Aymond. Free speech at its best.I want someone like him watching these guys we elect.
Sorry. Aymond is apparently inconsiderate as he is obtuse. And I asked a friend of mine who is an ADA and he said that he was not toooooo sharp. Not incompetent but he wouldn't refer a friend or client to him. Sorry.
Whatever. I agree with the courage and truth bit, but please, these long diatribes consisting of he hit me, no he hit me first is totally out of control.
correct me if i am wrong, but although the city charter does say
"(D) No special legal counsel shall be employed by the city except by written contract and approval of the city council."
that does not mean that these contract lawyers serve at the leisure of the council, does it? Approval of the council simply means they pass an ordinance---or no?
Who is this guy that says he is 6'5" tall, weighs 255 lbs. and wants to beat Aymond's ass? He's the one I wish would go away! He seethes with hate. More creepy than Greggy.
"I asked a friend of mine who is an ADA and he said that he was not toooooo sharp."
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...
ALL of the ADAs in Rapides Parish are MORONS!!!
No they’re not! Bob Levy, who runs the IV-D office, is hardly a moron. Chris Hazel isn’t, either. Get a grip.
Bad info. Roger Breedlove is probably the most intelligent guy you will ever meet. Jerry Henderson and Loren Lampert are considered great prosecutors and have national reputations. Rocky Willson and Andy VanDyke enjoy tremendous respect in the legal community. And you are still wrong - the city attorney appoints all the other attorneys and like all contracts including the one for toilet paper at the fire department, the council must approve the contract.
And you are still wrong - the city attorney appoints all the other attorneys and like all contracts including the one for toilet paper at the fire department, the council must approve the contract.
Read the fuckin City Charter dumbass
Roger Breedlove is probably the most intelligent guy you will ever meet.
Lol Hahaha
"Who is this guy that says he is 6'5" tall, weighs 255 lbs. and wants to beat Aymond's ass? He's the one I wish would go away! He seethes with hate. More creepy than Greggy."
That guy is me and to clarify the posts here, I'll use this name from now on.
Let's set the record straight shall we. I have no wish to kick Tubby's ass, although I certainly could do so, as couls almost everyone on this blog...including Scarlet.
Here's what I want fron our fat little nut case.
I want him to tell the truth, and post it here for all to see. This BS about his website not having enough room is crap. For $7.95 a month the fat little toad can get almost unlimited space in Yahoo.
Anyone who goes to Round Boy's office does so at their own peril. He video's everything and tapes all meetings he has there. He has been cited by a 26th district judge for falsifying evidence in family court case. he clains he did not know the audio tape had been altered, but the defendent in the custody case says otherwise. He lost that one big time by the way. Point is Tubby ain't above bending the truth to get what he wants.
Calling me out for a fistfight is BS also...He would like nothing better than to know who I really am so he can pepper me with frivilous civil suits until the day I die. That's his style.
Some of you her are beginning to see Tubby for what he is...a nut case.
So I'll offer this fat boy...Post your evidence once and for all. Prove that I'm the liar. Surely you have the $7.95 to buy additional web space.
Put up or shut up asshole, prove that you ain't a damn stinking liar and I'll go away and never post here again.
Until then, I will attack you relentlessly until you tell the truth.
Oh, to the Heath guy in Deville, if you're for real, careful to not let your mouth overload your ass, even though they both smell the same.
To the rest of the Anonymous posters who favor Tubby, nice try Aymond...we know it's you.
to 8:05:23
Three things are painfully obvious:
1. You do not know Roger Breedlove;
2. You do not have many intelligent friends; and
3. Your friends may have NO intelligent friends.
I am not saying that either of you is being unreasonable because Mr. Aymond and his detractor are both obviously dispicable, but could you guys take it somewhere else - maybe the public bathroom at Beulow????
Anon fella said apparenly you are afraid of Aymond in many ways. I you would be telling the truth you would not be afraid of a law suit. As stated before you got an alligator mouth with a hummingbird ass. Your cowardice is apparently by your blogger name. Aymond, be he right or wrong, signs his postings. If he is not telling the truth numerous folks he has made statements about could sue him. They remain silent.
"Oh, to the Heath guy in Deville, if you're for real, careful to not let your mouth overload your ass, even though they both smell the same."
As far as being real I am real and don't worry about me cashing checks my ass can't cover. Cowardly wimps like you have never impressed me. Aways remember the old axiom "To Proud to Run, To Old to Fight." ou come take as much of this old ass as you want.
But I'l do you one better seeing as how you would rather fight with words then any other method. Mr. Aymonds when you can prove who this individual is I would like for you to take what ever action necessary to sue him on my behalf. I believe he threatened my life. I am an old man and now am in fear of my life from this individuals threats. My reading of the law concerning blogs allow us, through the courts, to identify this individual. Let us try and put this on in the Court Room defending his actions. My readings seem to reveal that the blog owner is as much responsible for allowing these threatening posting as the individual that made the threat. We need to include this individual in any actions.
Mr. Aymond do you want to take this on a contingency basis or for a fee? Seems to me you have as much at stake in findin out who this individual is. I believe his threat is suficient legal grounds to pursue the matter, identify him, identiy tbe blog owner and see if we can get deep into their assets and I think we should.
Mr. Heath, if you are trying to give away some of your ass, perhaps you need to consider the Beulow mens room also. I understand there is a lot of ass exchange there and you can meet your two pen pals.
My grandfather would tell me time and again ... "it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are stupid than open it and prove it". What a wise man my grandfather was ....
Buhlow
How old were you when your grandfather figure out that you were stupid?
Member agrees not to transmit through the Service any unlawful, harassing, libelous, abusive, threatening, or harmful material of any kind or nature. Member further agrees not to transmit any material that encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international law or regulation. Attempts to gain unauthorized access to other computer systems are prohibited.
Blogspot.com Terms of Service are very interesting? Seems as the Blog owner has a lot of liability. In fact Blogspot.com has a feature to allow the Blog owner to "read a posting" before it is posted to determine if the Blog owner desires to assume the liability of the posting.
Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code (47 USC § 230)
Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." This federal law preempts any state laws to the contrary: "[n]o cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section." The courts have repeatedly rejected attempts to limit the reach of Section 230 to "traditional" Internet service providers, instead treating many diverse entities as "interactive computer service providers."
click here for more information
. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES MEMBER EXPRESSLY AGREES THAT USE OF THE SERVICE IS AT MEMBER'S SOLE RISK. THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY PYRA SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, RESULTING FROM THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICE OR FOR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS AND SERVICES OR RESULTING FROM ANY GOODS OR SERVICES PURCHASE OR OBTAINED OR MESSAGES RECEIVED OR TRANSACTIONS ENTERED INTO THROUGH THE SERVICE OR RESULTING FROM UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF MEMBER'S TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE, EVEN IF HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES SO SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
Member agrees: (1) to comply with US law regarding the transmission of technical data exported from the United States through the Service; (2) not to use the Service for illegal purposes; (3) not to interfere or disrupt networks connected to the Service; and (4) to comply with all regulations, policies and procedures of networks connected to the Service.
3. Pyra PRIVACY POLICY It is Pyra's policy to respect the privacy of Members. Therefore, Pyra will not disclose to any third party Member's name or contact information. Pyra will also not monitor, edit, or disclose the contents of a Member's information unless required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (1) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Pyra; (2) protect and defend the rights or property of Pyra; or (3) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of Pyra service's users or the public; (4) fix or debug problems with the BlogSpot servers/software/service.
Anyone can find anything with verbage supporting their position. By the way we saw that did you go the synogogue this morning?
Yes, he was the one on the side with a can of spray paint wearing a brown shirt.
Is there any truth to the rumor that Brewer violated campaign finances rules by taking loans from contributors, including Mary Jo Mansour, and not reporting the loans?
If this is true, then something should be done. We all know DB didn't win the election, but you shouldn't be allowed to bend the rules, regardless of who wins or loses.
Anyone who goes to Round Boy's office does so at their own peril. He video's everything and tapes all meetings he has there. He has been cited by a 26th district judge for falsifying evidence in family court case. he clains he did not know the audio tape had been altered, but the defendent in the custody case says otherwise. He lost that one big time by the way. Point is Tubby ain't above bending the truth to get what he wants.
Anyone who stops by my office can see there is no video camera there. And, as the last time you ranted about falsified evidence and another poster called you on it, give us the case name and docket muber so that we can see for ourselves. You are an absolute liar. The 26th Judicial District Court is located in Bossier Parish, and I do not recall having ever litigated a case of any kind in Bossier Parish. My practice is located primarily in Rapides, Grant and Avoyelles Parishes,although I have once handled something in Monroe, once in Columbia, and once in Vernon, none of which are in the 26th JDC. If you can prove what you say, I will owe all an appology and need to see a doctor about my memory.
Once again, I will tell you that, either you vile rantings have me confused with someone else or, you are simply making up bullshit. Give us the name of the judge, names of the parties and docket number. Your failure to produce that information should show that you are full of shit. No extra webspace is necessary to post that information. You have a serious mental problem Sir, and should seek help for it.
Dear Friday 9:04 a.m. & 9:17 a.m., Anonymous:
The way I see it from reading the Town Talk, Mayor-Elect Roy's Transition Team consists of a diverse group of people. Out of all of them, why would you question Deborah Randolph? I think you are insinuating that Mrs. Randolph is only there because she was an armpiece to the current mayor. Wrong--Mrs. Randolph, who is my daughter, has accomplished many things in her own right. She is a business owner, lobbyist for Rapides Health System, St. Mary's Residential Training School and other clients. She was appointed by the Gov. & confirmed by Senate to serve on Reg. 6 Health Consortium. She serves on Executive Committee of Chamber of Commerce over the Governmental Affairs Division. She had a distinguished career at CHRISTUS before forming her own business two years ago. Her community service includes, past board member of Rotary. She's currently vice president of the Friends of LA Public Broadcasting Board. She has been very involved with Shepherd Center and United Way in the past. Prior to that, she was a journalist. While at KALB-TV, she won an award from the Associated Press for a series of stories she did about dangerous school buses in Vernon Parish. She has worked as a volunteer on political campaigns since she was in her teens. These are just some of her accomplishments. These were things she did on her own before and/or in addition to being the mayor's wife. So, why would she be any less qualified than the others on the list? I understand that as her father, I am prejudiced, but nonetheless, I know she's qualified. There is no pay involved and this is a short term thing, so I fail to understand your beef.
Ok Deborah's father - perhaps you will be big enough to take credit for your son's management of the Brewer campaign. Do you count the silverware and check your wife's jewelry every time he leaves?
I just called my daughter to tell her what I wrote on this blog. She was pretty embarrassed. She says it's best not to dignify ugly stuff by writing on here. She made me promise not to do it again! But, I don't know, because I'm miffed about what I'm reading about my son-in-law on here, too. I'm 69 and I generally don't take orders very well anymore.
Oh my goodness! Dad, stop right now. I mean it. Please. No more.
Too bad. Your son-in-law took orders pretty well. Unfortunately, the folks giving them were not friends of his or Alexandria. Maybe things will get better for us and them.
I have a great deal of respect and affection for your daughter and her husband. He just lost control of himself and our city and we all suffered.
My son worked his heart out on that campaign. He was an on sight manager, not a strategist. He did not agree with everything that was done. But he tried to do his best. I am proud of him, too. That is all I have to say about that. At my daughter's request, I'll take the high road and won't write anything else on here.
How do you define suffering, anonymous? Union Tank Car coming to town? New construction all over the place? More places to go downtown? A wonderful zoo, great city ballparks? Why do you think Alexandria is in such bad shape? I don't think the majority of people think that. Maybe you can't stand the thought of minorities having some positions of authority now. Well, if that's it, you need to get over it. I agree that it was time for new leadership in the mayor's office. But that does not mean the city has gone to hell in a handbasket. That's just not accurate. Now we have a new mayor. Let's quit belly aching about the past and get behind him and give him a chance.
bullshit on the Debras father ...He said "Son in law" it was his SON. so nice try whoever you are . ...
No, that anonymous (3:29 p.m.) was talking about Ned, his son-in-law. Saying he hoped things would get better, etc. The previous poster 3:19 p.m. was talking about his son David who worked in the DB campaign.
While some of you will continually complain about Greg's postings, you might want to consider the fact that he has been very persistant in pursuing unethical and illegal behavior for several years and due to his persistance, is now having results such as the feds investigating and the state police re-opening the case for further investigation. Instead of complaining, we might all learn a few lessons about redress of greivances and keeping our politicos honest.
And the likely next poster who has anything bad to say anything about Aymond will be someone who works in the city hall of pineville, ball or the waterdistrict.....So fire away. I like Aymond exposing things and hope he keeps it up. No wonder you guys call him names. Which one of the crooks are you?
Hey Gang, I'm not a public employee, and have never worked for any of the listed public entities.
But...ask anyone who resides north of the river about Greg Aymond. Ask them about his involvment in Big Creek. Ask anyone about their opinion of this guy's character. You won't get a favorable opinion.
Next, ask how his actions have resulted in criminal sanctions against any public official. It's never happened. The Anonymous poster who tagged Aymond as a megalomaniac is right.
Biff, I have read your posts here, and have the upmost respect for you, but Aymonds has conned you.
You say you have seen his evidence. If this evidence is not contrived, and is as powerful as Aymond says it is, why aren't these people in jail?
Why is it that every investigation he claims he started never bears any fruit?
Why are these corrupt criminals he claims to have the goods on, still in office and walking the streets, respected, free men?
If he is such a powerful corruption fighter, a crusader for justice, full of courage, why doesn't he make this all available to us on the web? Why is he still eeking out a living as an priviate practice attorney? Seems like he should be working for the DA or Atty General, maybe the Justice Department or the FBI...
Fact is, he's not any of these things...he is just a podunk hick lawyer with visions of his own self importance.
Seems to me all BS that has been said about Aymond is just that, BS. However, Aymonds has always been the one who makes the charges against piblic officials. The rest of the assholes here just want to smear him personally.
So, here's my challenge to you Mr. Aymond. You can scan in any document and create a PDF of that document for posting on your own blog here at Blogspot for no cost.
You can also have any analog tape recording converted to a WAVE file for little or no cost. There is free shareware to do this available over the net. Post your evidence, and shut up your enemies once and for all.
Unless of course you ARE a liar.
Anon 3:29 must be a city employee to imply we are suffering. Economically we are beating the pants off every of the area of the State, except Lafayette and have been pre-Katrina and especially in the pos-Katrina Louisiana. Central Louisiana has been on a roll lately, we can't afford to stop now and get bogged down in politics and back biting.
As for David's participation in the campaign - I know he wanted to quit many times, but didn't. He was there to raise funds, not give advice on what she should do. Besides, Delores wasn't taking his when he gave it to her.
Post your evidence, and shut up your enemies once and for all.
Or here is another option, once again, come by my office and see it or hear it. The facts of some of the stuff are already on the State Ethics Board website, so you can read it there.
But...ask anyone who resides north of the river about Greg Aymond. Ask them about his involvment in Big Creek.
I am not embarrassed about Big Creek. As the Water District's attorney, and after a decade of court battles, and at the Water Board's instructions, attempts to removed the District's weir on Big Creek and stop getting water from that Creek were defeated. At that time, over 90% of Water District 3's water came from Big Creek. The District has had Tommy David for years search for alternative well sources, but have not found sufficent quantity or quality to meet the needs of Caomp Beauregard. Plasti-Pac. Dresser Industrties, Procter & Gamble, the Town of Ball, parts of the City of Pineville, and the needs of the homes, business, shools or fire protection of Ward 10 and parts of 9 and 11.
So exaclty what did the Big Creek crack mean?
new cenla blog sheriff race 2007
To David's Father - I don't mean to show any disrespect to you, but your son didn't know what he was doing in that campaign. We worked and worked and would ask him over and over again what he wanted to do about this and that. He didn't have a clue and couldn't make a decision. We finally just started making decisions on our own. I think maybe David needs to consider doing something else. He does not know how to run a campaign. Either that, or he's just not willing to get out from behind the desk long enough to learn.
How can you blame David for the fall of the Brewer campaign? She minimized his role well before the primary election and refused to listen to any of his advice.
There are two people to blame for Brewer's colossal failure: Roy Fletcher and Delores Brewer.
If I were David, I would have quit the minutes Delores accused Ned of entering into illegal contracts.
Did you work on that campaign? No disrespect intended and I'm not blaming him for her loss. My point is, he was lost in that campaign. He never knew what to do when. Anytime he was asked a question on anything that I heard, he didn't know what to do. He was like a fish out of water.
"Or here is another option, once again, come by my office and see it or hear it. The facts of some of the stuff are already on the State Ethics Board website, so you can read it there."
Why not post it Aymond? What's wrong with making your evidence public, if it's the truth.
Deborah Randolph is one of my closest friends. She is a thoughtful and caring wife, mother and friend. Jealousy is such a "telling" word and that is what comes to mind when I read the negative posts regarding her. She had been a major player in many worthwhile projects in our area. Ned has been the best mayor this city has ever had and Deborah has been a wonderful mayor's wife. Let's give credit where it is due and stop this "nonsense" of talking negative about wonderful people that you obviously do not know. When you want to step up to the plate and give back to your community the way that they have, I'm sure they can direct you to places where volunteers are needed on some very worthwhile projects.
Sounds like a reasonable request Aymond. Post the evidence.
"Deborah Randolph is one of my closest friends.....She had been a major player in many worthwhile projects in our area."
Really??? I suppose the huge amounts of cash she extracted from this community had nothing at all to do with political connections and good old bok politics? Let's not forget her real estate deals with the city....
Who is the dumbass on KALB that "interviews" the celebrites????
Is he really retarded or just acting????
"...you might want to consider the fact that he has been very persistant in pursuing unethical and illegal behavior for several years and due to his persistance, is now having results such as the feds investigating and the state police re-opening the case for further investigation."
Spanky...you know this as fact? Where did you get the information from? Precisely what case is the FBI looking into? and what case did the State Police re-open? Give us the facts, be specific.
A word of explanation as to why I used "Anonymous" in my post regarding my friendship with Deborah Randolph. To use my name would only serve as a basis for someone else to be attacked by the "attackers not producers" on this blog.
Since you know so much about Deborah's "hugh amounts of cash" and "real estate deals" -why don't you share that with everyone on the blog. Untrue statements like that are why this blog will end up being ineffective in future campaigns and city development. I'm sure the words, "low self-esteem" are front and center in describing yourself.
Sounds like a reasonable request Aymond. Post the evidence.
Apparently some of you are mindless idiots. Have many times do I have to say you are welcome to come to my office and see andf hear the evidence. I have absolutly no intention of spending more money out of my own pocket to get sufficient webspace, scan hundreds of pages of documents and post them.
If you want to scan them, provide the webspace, and upload all of that you are most welcome.
I guess nobody wants to come to my office for the same resaons that they prefer to be cowards here. This is the last time I will answer this question for those of you who obviously rode the short school bus. If you desire to ignorantly keep mouthing off about something you do not know, their appears little I can do to help you out of your stupidity. Are you too stupid to look up the factual findings on the State Ethics Board website? I am beginning to favor genetic engineering.
Greg Aymond's question for the 50th time:
"Apparently some of you are mindless idiots. Have many times do I have to say you are welcome to come to my office and see andf hear the evidence. "
Our answer for the 50th time:
"Once."
First of all, the Hebron matter has been referred to the Justice Department by the state AG's office and the La State Police are re-opening the investigation to be specific. This occurred in the past week and the events must run their course before the results are available. As with any investigation, facts are gathered, analyzed, and referred for whatever action to whatever jurisdiction is proper and in the time frame that is required. All I can tell you is to be attentive to developments as they occur as no one can predict the outcome. However, the wheels are turning and those that proclaimed there was no substance to the allegations will be the same ones asking for the salt shaker to season their crow. Time shall reveal the truth.
The calls for proof seem to be increasing...perhaps the regulars to this blog are maturing in their skepticism of those who spout wayward thoughts as fact.
Personally, I have no quarrel with Attorney Aymond, however I must point out that Aymond has been the accuser in almost every post he has authored. As such, it seems reasonable that if he is to accuse in this forum, then he should substantiate his accusations in this same forum. Aymond would be required to do this in a court of law. Is he not asking us to assume the role of jury when he places before us his allegations? Reason dictates that he supply proof in the same venue as he casts accusations.
Almond’s detractors counter with accusations of their own, and still, deny us proof.
To publicly accuse is acceptable, to publicly accuse without offering proof in the same venue shows the most vile form of cowardice.
Survey says…Both sides of the Aymond row display a persistent lack of backbone. Both sides offer “facts” which are questionable because of the party’s reluctance to offer public proof. Anyone who throws accusations without substantiation, flirts with dishonesty.
The feathers and bones have spoken.
It amazes me that folks would still be chewing on the outcome of the mayoral election instead of accepting the outcome and deciding how they are going to make the best of a new reality. Delores' defeat is as simple as putting lipstick on a pig and finding no suitors for the swine, get over it and move on. This town has been stuck in the past for far too long as it is.
Well lets bring this to a head. Greg, if you ill find out where to sign up for a website that will allow you to post ALL of your evidence and link it from this blog I will personally pay for it. Find out how much and give me your committement to load it up and I will contact you and write you a check. This doesnt have to be a life time committment but a month or two should be enough to shed the light on this corruption you claim. Deal? OR NO Deal? All you have to do is sign on here with theh price and promise and I wil call you with the $$$
"I have absolutly no intention of spending more money out of my own pocket to get sufficient webspace, scan hundreds of pages of documents and post them.
Two objections here, both are straw dogs...Cost? Not a factor Aymond. You can get the required space on your site for less than $20.00. Besides you don't seem to mind paying for all those copies of public documents you claim you are going to request from the DA.
Second: Hundreds of pages to scan??PLease Aymond...scan the most relevant pages and post a dozen or so. That should be enough to satisfy the most vocal of your critics.
Oh, we want to hear the Dupree tapes also.
One last thing Aymond, I have been to the ethics website. Nothing posted there of a CRIMINAL nature, or violations serious enough to warrant more than a few dollars in fines.
I thought we were talking about real corruption here?
Post the proof Aymond, post the proof.
Deal? OR NO Deal?
Deal. You find the web site, you hire someone to get a scanner and scan the hundreds of pages of documents in my office and upload them, and I have already converted the tapes to MP3's.
By the Way, many of the ethics Board Rulings and the photographs are already on my website at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CentralLaPolitics/
If you are one of the cowards, you can sign up for membership with a fake i.d. and make up a yahoo emial address.
Mr. Amond, this sounds like a fair request. It seems that certain trust issues make people not wish to go to your office but it would be far more effective and meqningful if the documents were put on public display and public access so that the public could be in a position to demand a fair, reasonable, and even-handed solution to any substantive charges. The additional cost should be negligable, particularly for a successful professional like yourself, and the time spent scanning the important and revealing documents would have to be far less than you spend regurgitating your life history on this blog a dozen times every day. I hope you will consider this offer. If you are truly serious about this stuff, you will publish your information for public consumption and cease all this physical threat stuff. That adds nothing to the conversation.
Spanky, you shouldn’t be amazed that folks would still be chewing on the outcome of the mayoral election. Many activists/volunteers have great difficulty in emotionally distancing themselves from their particular candidates and campaigns. For some, if not most, it’s nearly impossible to remain stoic, emotionally, while exhibiting the requisite enthusiasm and dedication. For the unseasoned and, in some cases, for the seasoned, who are close friends of the candidate, it is impossible. That’s what we’re seeing now.
I agree Mr. Aymond. The request of you to publish your evidence is reasonable and prudent.
If you do indeed post your evidence, you will silence your detractors once and for all.
Yup, the previous posters are right. Aymonds should post his evidence. And if he has his tapes already converted to MP3s like he says, the space they take up in compressed form is really small.
Post the Proof!
Mr. Aymond, if you put this information in the general public's hands it will be extremely difficult if not impossible for certain of our public officials to ignore, overlook, or sweep under the rug. We will see what the DA saw and ignored. That will be a true public service and will make us focus on the issues instead of bashing each other.
I sense a desire on Mr. Aymond's part NOT to post what documents he claims to have. I wonder why?
Several reasons come to mind. First, he really does not have what he claims to have. Second, what he has is not real evidence of any wrongdoing. Or third, his evidence is false and would lead to lawsuits from those he seeks to damage and thus cannot be made public.
All three reasons seem to tilt the scales in favor of his opposition.
Hmmmmm seems like Mr. Aymond's credibility is on the line here...
Be fair. Aymond has agreed to post the documentary and mp3 evidence. Give him a reasonable chance to comply. In the meanwhile we should put this topic and particularly the aggressiveness on hold. The onus is now on Aymond. Leave him, and us, alone.
Bluffing is over, chips are on the table...time to call. What'cha got Aymond?
Fair enough, Aymond posts what he has to substantiate his claims, and is completely vindicated. If he fails to do so, he has been publicly exposed as a liar.
see the name?
ymond to publish his documentation is a covert attempt by those concerned about what and whom are being investigated? Wouldn't this give them a leg up on possible legal attactivity.
Age teaches one to allow things to unfold naturally. I would keep my powder dry, let the authoritites do their thing and see what the future brings.
I believe in the legal process both criminal and civil. I believe a citizen that has been wronged by another has the right to sue the offending party. It should also be noted that I believe in it so strongly I have, in the past made use of the procedures available for relief in the legal system and would not hesitate to do so again.
Civilized, intelligent human beings settle their differences in a Court of Law. That is why I gave, in public, Aymond the authority to pursue Anon fellow said. One would think Aymond would enjoy finding out who the person is and demonstrating his prowess as an Attorney.
"Civilized and intelligent"
That's you Heath. You all the way.
Greg, the offer is to simply PAY for it. I will not take the time to scan anything or find the website but I will pay for it. SO, please just get the amount of money and confirm that you have found the website and post that info on here and I will send you a check. YOU have made the charges and people seem to genuinely be interested enough to ask you to make it available online. Please do not let their attention go disappointed by playing a shell game with us and telling ME to find the site and scan the documents. I for one do not want to be sued if you are going to post fraudulant of untrue docs so no i will not do anymore than pay for the site. Once and for all lets put up or shut up. Would you accept the allegations of yours without proof? Of course you would not. You would need proof. So does everyone else. Find the site, find the cost and I will pay. It will be upon you to download it all. You can even build the suspense by setting a date and time as to when you will have it all online. Make it a week from now or something. I think you could find yourself as a very read poster if you just put some weight behind your charges and some proof behind your allegations. OK
?
If the person is offering to pay for everything will not even identify themselves how does Aymond or anyone know the offer is for real. Let's post your name, address and phone number with the offer just to be sure Aymonds can now your telling the truth.
So far all I have seen is anonymous words. Put your money and name where your mouth is.
I agree with supposedly Heath from Deville. Let's stop the use of anonymous and require real names. Bet that will break up a lot of this. When you become liable for your postings maybe the untruths, threats of violence and harrassment will stop.
This blog site serves no purpose other then allowing cowards an avenue to vent their hatred. Look at Mrs. Randolphs father. A 69 year old man moved to anger by attacks on his children. Any parent would come to the assistance of a child being attacked maliciously by cowards to evil to post their name.
This site does no good, is merly a haven for cowards to attempt to destroy others out of jealousy and to divert attention from their transgressions.
After seeing how badly these remarks upset the 69 year old gentleman the owner of this site, if he has an ounce of common decency will shut this cesspool down.
I am amazed at this infantile back & forth snipeing. Somebody made a reasonable offer to facilitate Aymond revealing all this stuff that he swears in squirilled away at his office - smoking guns, proof positive, red-handed conduct, tapes and pictures and documents. Aymond would have us believe that this stuff is really important and is the nucleus of his existence and will vindicate him from the personal and professional criticism that he seems to constantly face in all walks of his life. Now you guys are "oh yeah!?"-ing each other wasting everyone's time and patience.
Except for Spanky, Greg's stock is rock bottem, and has been so in this community for quite some time. Even Spanky is begging "show me". How did Greg acquire this terrible reputation. Does he deserve it. Does he want to reverse it? Stay tuned.
Apparently you morons do not understand yet. I AM NOT going to go out and hire extra help, nor use my staff's time which I rely upon to make a living like you, to sit and scan hundreds of pages of documents and post them on a website. Apparently none of you are willing to expend the time and costs either. Spanky has seen and heard the evidence, and you call him a liar. The State Ethics Board has conducted an investigation and made factual findings, and has put them on its website. Photographs are on my website, and nobody has even gone to look. All of that leads me to belive that you simply desire to mouth off and don't really care about any evidence.
Rest assured, regardless of what you say or think, I will continue to report political graft and corruption that I know of, no matter where it is located. Believe it or not, I do not care. Yes it angers me that so many mentally deficient people have access to computers, but I am not doing what I do in order to win a popularity contest. Unlike many of you, I do something, and not just sit around and bitch on a Blog behind an anonymous name. My efforts are directed at law enforcement, who can do something.
Beware Unpleasantness
"Liars are noticeably less cooperative than truth-tellers," found psychologists Bella M. DePaulo and Wendy L. Morris in a review of studies on deception. "Liars also make more negative statements and complaints than truth-tellers do, and they appear somewhat less friendly and pleasant," they write in The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts.
Signs of Stress
Look for dilated pupils and a rise in vocal pitch. Psychologists DePaulo and Morris found that both phenomena were more common in liars than truth-tellers
Someone who consciously is trying to make you think he's honest--for instance, by injecting the phrase "to be honest"--may be lying. Most people assume they will be trusted most of the time. If someone expects otherwise, take a moment to ask yourself why.
Know Thyself
One reason liars succeed is that listeners don't really want to know the truth, says psychologist Feldman. So be honest with yourself about what it is you want to hear. You may wish to believe that a trusted employee didn't have his hand in the cookie jar. But does his story actually make sense?
Greg, loosely translated, your answer is "no". We get that. What we don't understand is: you spend endless hours on this (and God know's how many others) blog honoring with the same mindless ramblings day after day, hour after hour. Why couldn't you use about 3% of that time to put up this info? Secondly, if your info is directed at law enforcement, why do you waste everyone's time on this gossip column?
Spanky just asks us to give you a chance because you profess to fight evil and corruption. Well Spanky, we did. And Spanky, I gotta trust that you recognized Greg's juvenile posturing. I mean, who knows? Maybe Greg's got something but is just so fucking objectionable that nobody wants to listen. At any rate, glance over this blog and see how many minutes and inches are wasted by talking about Greg's obsession and what he ain't gonna do about it. God I miss John Sams.
A brief re-cap is in order:
A) Lawyer Aymond claims to have proof of his allegations but will not PUBLICLY post them because he claims the documents are too numerous and would take up too much space.
B) An Anonymous poster offers to provide the funds necessary to scan the documents and pay for the website on which to post the evidence.
C) Aymond refuses the offer.
D) Another poster speculates the reasons for Aymond's crawfishing.
E) Aymonds restates his objections to a PUBLIC viewing of his evidence.
F) Leading to further speculation that Aymond's "evidence" is false, or could lead to litigation against him, or does not exist.
Time to show your cards Aymond if you are to be believed.
Deborah Randolph has never had a real estate deal with the city, ever, ever. That is absolutely false.
Perhaps they are talking about the scam where Deborah was trying to unload downtown St. Rita's property to the city for an unGodly (if I may) amount of money and was caught and stopped. That, like Delores's AHA contract, was heist that was prevented by people with more power and greed.
Please note Aymond's choice of words:
"Apparently you morons do not understand yet."
"Yes it angers me that so many mentally deficient people have access to computers..."
"Apparently some of you are mindless idiots."
"...they prefer to be cowards...obviously rode the short school bus...ignorantly keep mouthing off...little I can do to help you out of your stupidity...I am beginning to favor genetic engineering..."
According to Webster's
Megalomania: A delusional mental disorder that is marked by feelings of personal omnipotence and grandeur and a distain for others.
Who is Spanky and how did he get to be so credible?
"Deal. You find the web site, you hire someone to get a scanner and scan the hundreds of pages of documents in my office and upload them, and I have already converted the tapes to MP3's."
In other words, my evidence is so much BS that it will get someone sued. I want it to be you and not me...
If you won't take the responsibility Greg, it must not be the truth...
Hey Greg, have you ever shared your files with the media?
Were they interested? What was their response?
Did they look at them, and report on them?
I would think they would be interested in factual evidence of wrongdoing.
Greg...I support you man and Im trying to help. But if you wont take me up on my offer then hell, I have to wonder myself. You don't have to download mountains of stuf just put any of it on the site and download the recording which would really impress people with your truthfulnes. I might be a stupid moron and you might be right but I thought my offer to pay for it was a chance for you to spill the beans with proof and not words. I will leave the offer open and hope that you will either take me up on it and post the stuff or give up.
Greg, my wife and I have been to your office. Tell me about the gigantic "staff" you got??????
To: We Saw That
Would you be willing to post the MP3 file Aymond has on your web site? After careful review, of course.
No lengthy documents, just the MP3.
Great Idea.!!!...Please post it there.
" Deborah Randolph has never had a real estate deal with the city, ever, ever. That is absolutely false."
This is true...the deal was halted as soon as it was made public.
From what I understand the recording is a conversation between Aymond and Dupree that Aymond recorded without Dupree's knowlege.
Somehow, this conversation proves Aymond was defamed, and proves the Louisiana Supreme Court wrong.
Go figure..
POST THE PROOF, POST THE TRUTH!
POST THE PROOF, POST THE TRUTH!
POST THE PROOF, POST THE TRUTH!
That is absolutely false about the real estate deal. I am a member of St. Rita Church and had involvement with that issue. Deborah Randolph was also a member of that church. St. Rita was trying to sell it's old church property to the city. It had nothing to do with her. Pastor at the time, Father Bruce Miller was called by Oldies 104 and asked if Deborah was involved and he confirmed that Randolph had nothing to do with any of the dealings with the city. She was merely an active member of the church. She went to one meeting to hear about the proposal. It meant nothing. She was not in a position of any authority with the proposal and she was not in any way the reason the deal didn't happen. The city did not wish to buy the property for the price asked, period. But even if it had, Mrs. Randolph would not have gotten one penny from that. Why would she? She worked at Cabrini at the time. She was not in the real estate business. She was not a paid staffer of the church. This was an Oldies 104 attempt at a hatchet job on the Randolph's and no one took it seriously once Father Miller went on the radio to dispute it. Who was more believable Randy Reynolds or Father Miller?...oh let me see. Geez. You people are no more than conspiracy theory nut jobs.
Spanky is a simple man who walks among many and deduces the truth from small shreds of information that appear over time and space to produce a mosaic of reality formed of the interaction of the many. Credibility comes from accuracy and forethought before expression.
Just one more fact to justify shutting this blog down. This "thing" is nothing but a place for malcontents, hate mongers and stirrers to anonymously lie and make accusations in an attempt to destroy people. Jealously and hatred apparently know kno bounds.
Uh, but ..uh...YOU'RE on here.
Hey Greg, have you ever shared your files with the media?
The day the numerous page report on the waterline was issued, at a public meeting, the Water Board gave the Town Talk a copy. Leggett, from the Town Talk, Babbs Zimmerman and Michelle Goddard from KALB, and the Northside Journal, have all been offered the evidence, numerous times, and none have taken me up on the offer. In fact, Robert Morgan, the Town Talk reporter who is assigned to cover the Water District, told me several months ago that he would "have to think about it."
I will supply the audio to We Saw That, if he is interested, and can, post it on his site.
Greg, my wife and I have been to your office. Tell me about the gigantic "staff" you got??????
You are right, I do not have much of a staff, which would make it even more difficult to scan and post all of that material. I don't recall ever claiming to have a "gigantic" staff. I only have a secreatary and a bookkeeper.
Apparently, many of you act as sharks on a wild feeding freenzy. You attack even Lamar's dead father, Deborah Randolph, Richard Heath, and countless others. Why not put your real names so that we can scrutinize your past, and make up things about you too?
These matters were brought up, so they will be posted. If you feel like bitching about the long post, simply scroll past this post.
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS
DATED: October 12, 2006 OPINION NO: 2004-416b
RE: In the matter of Wes Hebron
The Board of Ethics (the “Board”) pursuant to the authority contained in LSA-R.S. 42:1141, conducted a confidential investigation concerning information that Wes Hebron, as an appointed member of the Board of Commissioners for the Rapides Parish Water District No. 3, may have violated Section 1112B of the Code of Governmental Ethics (LSA-R.S. 42:1101 et seq.) (the “Code”) by participating and voting on matters pending before the board involving his brother, Roy Hebron.
On the basis of information obtained during the investigation, and with the concurrence of Wes Hebron, the Board now makes the following essential:
I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
Willie Wesley (“Wes”) Hebron served as an appointed member of the Board of Commissioners for the Rapides Parish Waterworks District No. 3 from 1997 to 2004.
2.
Rapides Parish Waterworks District No. 3 was created in 1949 by the Rapides Parish Police Jury to provide water service to the Rapides Parish area.. The powers and duties of the waterworks district are exercised by its appointed Board of Commissioners.
3.
In order for a resident to receive water service, the district requires that the property owner tap into an existing, district-owned water main. District policy, also, requires that the property owner run his own line across privately owned property to the public water main.
4.
Tapping into an existing water main does not require board approval. A resident would submit a request for water service and pay a tap fee to the district. The tap fee includes a $75 security deposit, a $30 connection fee, a $10 inspection fee, and the cost of labor and materials needed to install a meter and connect it to the water main. The resident would be responsible for any costs for connecting his residence or business to such meter.
5.
Requests to upgrade an existing water line or install a new water line to service an area are subject to public comment and must be approved by the Board of Commissioners for the Rapides Parish Waterworks District No.3.
6.
At the January 14, 2003 meeting of the Board of Commissioners for the waterworks district, the Board voted to approve the upgrade of a water line located on Dryden Road to address low water pressure issues in the area. Such concerns were brought to Board President Tommy Hollingsworth’s attention by Roy Hebron, Mayor of the Town of Ball.
7.
Roy Hebron is the brother of Wes Hebron.
8.
While the Dryden Road project was underway, Roy Hebron contacted Jimmy French, General Manager of the waterworks district, to request that a water line be installed on a privately owned road, hereinafter “No Name Road”, that intersected Dryden Road. Such road leads to property owned by Roy Hebron and his wife where they were constructing their residence.
9.
At the time of Roy Hebron’s request there was only one other house on No Name Road. This house receives water service by a line the owner ran to a meter located on Burma Road that taps into the public water main.
10.
At the time of Mr. Hebron’s request, there was no existing water line down No Name Road. His request was for a new line to be run by the waterworks district on the privately-owned road.
11.
Mr. French informed Mr. Hebron that his request required board approval, acquiring rights-of-way and servitudes, the allocation of funds for such a project and approval from the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (hereinafter “DHH”).
12.
Subsequent to his conversation with Mr. Hebron, Mr. French was verbally instructed by Board President Tommy Hollingsworth to add the new water line installation down No Name Road to the Dryden Road project.
13.
Proper approval from the Board of Commissioners for the waterworks district, and from the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals was not obtained prior to the installation of the pipeline down No Name Road.
14.
Board President Tommy Hollingsworth instructed district employees to discuss with Roy Hebron the size line to run on No Name Road. Roy Hebron instructed district employees on where to run the line and what size line to use.
15.
The installation of a 4 inch pipeline was completed on January 28, 2004. The line was laid on the south side of the road running east to west, and at the end of the road, it turned and crossed the road in order for the water line to be connected to Mayor Hebron’s property at the property line.
16.
The waterworks district incurred $5,385.73 in expenses in installing the water line down No Name Road.
17.
In March of 2004, when the district’s crew was installing the water mains on No Name Road, it was discovered that the waterworks district did not have a servitude on No Name Road.
18.
The Board of Commissioners for the waterworks district became aware of the installation of the pipeline without their approval and on April 13, 2004, the board voted to initiate an investigation into the matter. Wes Hebron voted to initiate such investigation.
19.
Roy Hebron tendered to the Jimmy French, the district’s General Manager, a conditioned payment of $5, 401 to reimburse the expenses incurred by the district in the installation of the pipeline down No Name Road. The Board of Commissioners voted to reject the payment and to request an unconditioned payment. Wes Hebron voted to reject the payment and to request an unconditioned payment.
20.
No reimbursement has been made.
21.
In August of 2004, the Board of Commissioners voted to accept the line run down No Name Road to Hebron’s property in the district’s system once the line meets the requirements set by DHH and is approved by DHH. Wes Hebron voted to accept the water line once the conditions had been met.
II.
APPLICABLE LAW
1.
Section 1112B of the Code of Governmental Ethics provides:
B. No public servant, except as provided in R.S. 42:1120, shall participate in a transaction involving the governmental entity in which, to his actual knowledge, any of the following persons has a substantial economic interest:
(1) Any member of his immediate family.
2.
Section 1112D of the Code of Governmental Ethics provides:
D. No appointed member of any board or commission, except as provided in R.S. 42:1120.1 and R.S. 42:1120.2, shall participate or be interested in any transaction involving the agency when a violation of this Part would result.
3.
The following terms are defined in Section 1102 of the Code and are relevant when analyzing the above Sections:
(13) “Immediate family” as the term relates to a public servant means his children, the spouses of his children, his brothers and their spouses, his sisters and their spouses, his parents, his spouse, and the parents of his spouse.
(21) “Substantial economic interest” means an economic interest which is of greater benefit to the public servant or other person than to a general class or group of persons...
III.
OPINION
It is the opinion of the Board that Wes Hebron violated Section 1112B of the Code of Governmental Ethics by participating and voting to initiate an investigation into the water line running to his brother’s property, voting to whether to accept or reject payment from his brother, and voting on the acceptance of the water line which serviced his brother’s property. Section 1112B prohibits a public servant from participating in any matter in which his immediate family member has a substantial economic interest. Roy Hebron clearly had a substantial economic interest in a water line which was run to his property and which appears to have only benefitted him. Therefore, Wes Hebron was prohibited from participating in such matters when they came before his board for consideration.
The Board is authorized to impose civil penalties pursuant to LSA-R.S. 42: 1153 and LSA-R.S. 42: 1155 upon finding that a violation of the Code has occurred. In this particular situation, given the facts outlined above, it is the conclusion of the Board that the interest of the public would be served by the imposition of a civil penalty of $1,000, all of which is suspended based on his future compliance with the Code of Governmental Ethics.
IV.
DECREE AND ORDER
For the foregoing reasons:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Board finds as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law that Wes Hebron violated Section 1112B of the Code of Governmental Ethics by participating and voting to initiate an investigation into the water line running to his brother’s property, voting to whether to accept or reject payment from his brother, and voting on the acceptance of the water line which serviced his brother’s property. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that a civil penalty of $1,000, all of which is suspended based upon future compliance with the Code, be and is hereby imposed upon Wes Hebron.
By Order of the Board this 12th day of October 2006.
s/Robert L. Roland s/Hank Perret
Robert L. Roland, Chairman Henry C. Perret, Jr., Vice-Chairman
s/Dr. Herbert V. Baptiste, Sr. s/John W. Greene
Dr. Herbert V. Baptiste, Sr. Judge John W. Greene
s/E. L. Guidry, Jr. s/Gwendolyn P. Hamilton
Judge E. L. Guidry, Jr. Gwendolyn P. Hamilton
Absent and did not participate. s/Michael T. Johnson
R. L. Hargrove, Jr. Michael T. Johnson
Absent and did not participate. s/Ascension Delgado Smith
Joseph Maselli Ascension Delgado Smith
s/Dolores R. Spikes
Dr. Dolores Spikes
CONSENT
The undersigned (a) stipulates to the facts found by the Board; (b) waives the procedural requirements contained in Section 1141 of the Code; (c) admits that his conduct, as described above, violated Section 1112B of the Code; (d) consents to the publication of this opinion; (e) agrees to comply with the conditions and orders set forth in this opinion; and (f) agrees not to seek judicial review of the findings and actions taken in this opinion.
s/Wes Hebron 8/28/06
The Board, by a majority vote of its membership, ordered that a public hearing be conducted for the purpose of exploring the following:
CHARGES
That Roy Hebron, the brother of an appointed member of the Rapides Parish Waterworks District No. 3, may have violated Section 1113B of the Code of Governmental Ethics [La. R.S.42:1113B] by entering into transactions which were under the supervision and/or jurisdiction of his brother’s agency, the Rapides Parish Waterworks District No. 3, in the following manner to wit:
• by instructing the staff of the Rapides Parish Waterworks District No. 3 install a new water pipeline down a privately owned road to service his residence without the proper approval by the Board of Commissioners for the waterworks district while his brother served as an appointed member of such board and,
• subsequent to the installation of such pipeline, by the acceptance of the water line by the district’s Board of Commissioners into the water district system at the district’s expense when the line only serviced Mr. Hebron’s property.
The hearing will be held in the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency Building Board Room, 2415 Quail Drive, 1st Floor, Baton Rouge, Louisiana on February 8, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. This public hearing will be conducted in accordance with the procedural requirements set forth in R.S. 18:1511.4C, provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and in conformity with the Rules adopted by the Board, a copy of which is enclosed.
In order to fully cooperate with you in this matter, we will, upon request, provide you with copies of all documents we may introduce into evidence and the names and addresses of all witnesses we intend to call. If you desire the attendance of any witnesses, the Board can issue subpoenas for those witnesses. In order to have subpoenas issued you must, at least ten (10) days in advance of the hearing, supply the names and addresses of the persons to be subpoenaed and, if you would like the witnesses to produce documentation at the hearing, state in detail the document(s) to be produced and the reasons that the production of the documentation will be relevant and material.
If I can provide you with any additional information, please call Peggy A. Sabadie at (225) 763-8777 or (800) 842-6630.
Yours truly,
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS
Robert L. Roland
For the Board
EB:RLR:pas
Enclosure
"Why not put your real names so that we can scrutinize your past, and make up things about you too?"
So let me get this straight. You want our names, addresses and such so you, can investigate us and spread lies?
Damn Aymond. You really are nuts!
The burning question is why doesn't Greg do all this ranting on his web page. He gave a party, nobody came, so he comes over to this site and monopolizes to whole goddam discussion. I don't know about his allegations or his politics but as a person he obviously ain't worth shit.
What kind of person would rather be dispised that alone?
Mr. Aymond, what will it take to satisfy you and make you feel that there is no longer a need for you to continue posting and reposting on this blog?
Bottem, I'm not sure that Aymond's objective is not just to torment and irritate others. There are some emotionally ill people who are so desparate for attentiion and recognition that they become masters at inspiring strong negative reaction. There are others who get the same amount of satisfying attention through pity. So it's not what you say or what he says but that somebody - anybody is talking to him. He doesn't care if you dispise him just don't ignore him. Mind you, they don't just want or need attention - they absolutely crave it. That might explain his affilliation with the KKK - any attention, even hatred or fear, just craves the attention. It's also possible that all the sociopaths in the KKK were able to relate to him and treat him with some degree of respect because of his profession. Anyway, I would not expect any relief in the near future. Before he leaves us alone he has to find a new group to enrage.
To Sigmund...
Amen!
Senator Byrd is a sociopath. Interesting.
What it is is your folks want to keep jerking Aymond off and no matter what he does he will never be right. Apparently he doesn't have the willpower to not respond to your childish taunting.
This blog is an embarrasssement to Central Louisiana and should be shut down.
While I agree with the last posts and their analysis of Aymond, none the less I am curious about him. Like a new specimen of lichen never seen before, Aymond is a curiosity. Forget for a moment his obvious imbalance and concentrate on the methodology of his communication. He says one thing, and then in the next post contradicts himself. He feigns importance and then destroys his own credibility. He is indeed an odd individual.
I, for one, disregard the validity of every word he says. However, I am also amazed at the thought process he displays! He is so detached from reality!
The burning question is why doesn't Greg do all this ranting on his web page. He gave a party, nobody came, so he comes over to this site and monopolizes to whole goddam discussion.
I post the Pineville and Hebron information on my website. Some dumbass started copying and pasting onto this site, other dumbasses joined in. When someone attacks me, I respond. So bitch and moan to the ones that want to attack me here. For every post I make, instead of discussing issues, there are numerous attacking me. Stop attacking me, and I will stop repsonding. Its simple.
So lets go back to talking about Alexandria things and leave the other stuff elsewhere. Or do you all suggest I have do not have the same rights as you do?
"This blog is an embarrasssement to Central Louisiana and should be shut down."
Last time we checked, nobody was forcing you to click that mouse button asshole...
wow you guys have been buzy lol. yes we will post the .mp3 audio files in question upon our receipt of them.
Despite all of our analysis and attempts at reason and persuasion, look how much time and space we have wasted on this sociopath. That really is a shame.
focus blog. focus. WATERSLIDE!
"bof'us"
should the water slide be aqua or a light blue? any thoughts?
Roger Breedlove is indeed smart 0- collects a full salary but mostly plays golf
Roger Breedlove is indeed smart 0- collects a full salary but mostly plays golf
"is urine a color?" i don't know. my broke d*ck parents could only afford the 8 crayola box. i used to beat up the kids with the 64 color box with built in sharpener.
I hope to have the non-existent MP3's to We Saw That later this week. They are in the process of being converted to MP3's on a cd this week.
be still my heart . . . .
"I hope to have the non-existent MP3's to We Saw That later this week. They are in the process of being converted to MP3's on a cd this week."
Translation:
"I have sent the tapes to my audio specialist so he can create a digital file that says what I want it to say. He's the same guy who "takes care" of all my other evidence."
Biff, urine is indeed a color. You should know this considering your experience with goat entrals. In case you forgot, that tiny sac full of a pale yellow liquid that you avoid at all costs?
It's that color...
Hey Aymond while you are at it record a message telling all the little kids there is no Santa Claus.
Could we leave Aymond alone and get back to discussing the future of the city?
What future? If you guys are the brain trust, we are in a heap o' trouble.
My neighbor has a dog. The dog comes to my house most everyday. If I pet it, it stays. If I ignore it the dog goes away. Deacon Blue
Very profound. I'll bet that your neighbor's dog still craps on your lawn. That is what we have here.
Solomon
Excellent new ruling on internet blog liability - does away with it.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/20/internet.libel.ap/index.html
Beware that decision shows that there is immunity, for example, Mr. Antics. No immunity exists for the poster of defamation.
This case turns on public policy and 1st amendment issues and that's pretty strong.
The more postings I read the smarter Aymond appears. What relevance does a Califronia Supreme Court decision have to do with the other 49 States? In fact, there was a recent publication of the number of times the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT has reversed anything that the Judicial system in California decided.
It would be an interesting study to determine if laws, rules and regulations of Al Gore's internet is under the auspices of the FCC.
We saw that you never fail to amaze me. More and more I believe you authored the book entitled French & Italian war heroes.
Post a Comment